Field Report / 005"In less than 1-month the team is writing one-off emails, building vertical aligned campaigns for inbound and outbound prospecting. Their calendars are organized to help manage their schedule and they have a solid hand-off plan between them and the sellers they support."
Stabilizing an inherited seven-person SDR team
Donna McCurley was asked to do two jobs at once: run Sales Enablement and manage a seven-person SDR team that had previously received effectively no training. She did not need a new manager. She needed structure her team could use immediately — messaging, campaigns, calendars and a handoff the sellers would actually trust.
7-person inherited SDR team with little prior training
Proof point 01
Client testimonial
Behavior and process change in under one month
Proof point 02
Client testimonial
Vertical-aligned campaigns and a defined SDR-to-seller handoff established
Proof point 03
Client testimonial · engagement deliverables
Report thesisAn enablement leader inherited a seven-person SDR team without giving up the enablement role — the work was to stabilize the team with playbooks and cadence rather than absorb it into one person's calendar.
- SDR Leadership
- Enablement
- Messaging
- Coaching
- Industry
- Facilities Management Software
- Engagement
- SDR Enablement Accelerator → Cadence & Sequence Build
- Dates
- 2023
Two sequenced projects in 2023: an SDR Accelerator covering messaging, cadences, tooling, workshops and process, followed by a focused cadence and sequence build. This report publishes enablement, behavior and capability outcomes only — no pipeline, meeting, quota or revenue figure is claimed, because none was measured or audited.
Artifacts from the work
A compact view of the work. Open any item to inspect it.
What was actually happening
ServiceChannel sells facilities management software into a competitive, fast-moving market, and the SDR function was where that pressure landed first. In the second half of the year Donna was handed two jobs at the same time: Sales Enablement for the wider org, and direct management of a seven-person SDR team that had come to her with close to zero formal training. She was clear-eyed about the constraint — she could not become a full-time SDR manager and still do enablement. What she needed was not more activity from the team. It was structure the team could operate without her standing over it.
What we found
The reps were working. The problem was that nothing they were doing was repeatable. Messaging was written from scratch every time, so quality tracked whoever happened to be writing. Campaigns were not aligned to a vertical, so the same generic angle went to very different buyers. Calendars had no shape, which meant prospecting lost to whatever else arrived that morning. And the handoff to the sellers was informal, so the moment a meeting was booked, quality control disappeared. None of those are training problems on their own. Together they are a system problem, and a system problem is what makes an inherited team feel unmanageable.
The team had inherited little to no formal SDR training foundation.
Every rep had built their own private method. There was no shared standard to coach against.
Messaging lacked consistency — no framework, no reusable structure.
Quality was personality-dependent, and nothing good could be copied across the team.
Campaigns were not aligned to verticals or personas.
Outreach spoke past the buyer, and results could not be attributed to a segment or an angle.
Rep calendars and daily workflow had no defined structure.
Prospecting was the first thing to lose the day, which made output unpredictable week to week.
The SDR-to-seller handoff was undefined and handled informally.
Meetings arrived to AEs with inconsistent context, which quietly erodes seller trust in the SDR team.
The internal owner was carrying enablement and SDR management simultaneously.
Anything that depended on her presence to work would not survive. It had to be inspectable and self-serve.
What we built
- SDR coaching delivered as both group sessions and 1:1 support, so reps got a shared standard and individual correction at the same time.
- A workshop series run with the team rather than at it — humanized sales messaging and email optimization, integrated outreach and nurture, sales tech and cold call and social, cadences and sequences, and time management.
- A ServiceChannel-branded Sales Accelerator Playbook covering who to prioritize, how to position, discovery, objection handling and SDR↔AE partnership.
- A messaging framework the team could actually apply, so writing a good email stopped being an act of inspiration.
- Vertical-aligned inbound and outbound campaigns blending calls and email.
- Calendar and daily workflow structure: defined daily priorities, metric expectations and a unified process across the team.
- A written SDR-to-seller handoff with clear expectations on both sides.
- A review of the existing tooling, with coaching on operating it day to day.
- A follow-on cadence and sequence build tailored to the team's key segments.
How the work ran
The Accelerator was front-loaded on messaging and cadences because that was the fastest thing the team could feel. Tooling and process work followed once there was something worth putting a process around. Workshops were the delivery mechanism and 1:1s were the correction loop. The follow-on cadence project came later, once the team had proved it would actually operate what was built.
- 01Messaging & cadencesWorkshops with the SDR team, a messaging framework and training on how to write to it.
- 02Tooling & processCoaching on tool use, then a process framework covering daily priorities and calendar structure.
- 03Playbook & handoffThe Sales Accelerator Playbook written and handed over, including the SDR↔AE handoff guidance that gave sellers a predictable intake.
- 04Adoption — first monthReps writing one-off emails, building vertical-aligned campaigns, organizing calendars and running the handoff plan. This is the point the testimonial captures.
- 05Follow-on cadence buildA separate, focused project to tailor cadences to key segments and refine what already existed.
Receipts from the engagement
The five pieces that turned individual effort into a team system, shown at a category level.
How workshops, coaching and documentation let the team run without constant supervision.
How the team operates now
The change Donna describes is not a number going up. It is that the team started behaving like a team with a system. Emails got written to a framework instead of from scratch. Campaigns got pointed at a vertical instead of at everyone. Calendars got shape. And the sellers stopped receiving meetings as a surprise, because there was a handoff plan with rules in it. That is what makes an inherited team manageable — and it is what let an enablement leader stop being a full-time SDR manager.
Inherited team with little to no formal SDR training
Group workshops plus 1:1 coaching against a shared standard
Written from scratch, inconsistent rep to rep
One-off emails written to a documented framework
Generic, not aligned to vertical or persona
Vertical-aligned inbound and outbound campaigns with persona variations
Unstructured calendars; prospecting lost the day
Organized calendars, defined daily priorities and metric expectations
Informal and inconsistent
Written handoff plan with clear expectations on both sides
Enablement leader absorbing full-time SDR management
Reusable playbook and coaching rhythm the team can be inspected against
What we can verify
- Reps writing one-off emails within the first month
- Vertical-aligned campaigns built for both inbound and outbound prospecting
- Calendars organized to manage the working day
- Handoff plan in active use between SDRs and the sellers they support
- Unified SDR process with defined daily priorities and metric expectations
- Cadences and sequences built into the team's existing tooling
- Tooling reviewed with usage coached rather than just recommended
- Handoff expectations documented on both sides
- ServiceChannel-branded Sales Accelerator Playbook owned in-house
- Messaging, discovery and objection handling documented
- Workshop materials and worksheets retained for future onboarding
- Enablement leader given an inspectable system rather than a permanent management burden
Deliberately absent from this report: meeting volume, quota attainment, pipeline, conversion lift and ROI. The engagement was scoped as enablement and process work, and no downstream revenue outcome was measured or audited. The strongest evidence here is behavioral and it is client-stated: Donna's testimonial describes what the team was doing in under a month.
“In 2H, I was asked to do two jobs: Sales Enablement and Manage a SDR team that had previously received zero training. I knew in order to be successful, I needed to learn from the best.”
“Tom over delivered, provided tons of group and 1:1 support. His ability to connect with this team was MIND BLOWING. It was as if he were a part of the team for years.”
What stayed behind
- ServiceChannel Sales Accelerator Playbook
- Messaging frameworks and completed workshop worksheets
- Discovery and objection-handling guidance
- Vertical-aligned inbound and outbound campaigns
- Cadences built into the team's existing tooling
- SDR↔AE handoff guidance
- Unified SDR process covering daily priorities and calendar structure
- Recorded workshop materials for future onboarding
What remained unproven
Every engagement leaves something unresolved. These are the limits of what this report can claim.
- No numerical performance outcome is published for this engagement, and none is claimed
- Longer-term retention of the cadence after the engagement was not measured
An inherited team does not need optimization. It needs clarity first — a standard to write to, a calendar with shape, and a handoff someone wrote down. Behavior changes fast once those exist, and that change shows up long before any revenue number does.
The thinking behind this work
- FrameworksMost SDR Coaching Is ReactiveReactive coaching starts after the miss. This is the inspection cadence: daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly. That surfaces the problem while there is still time to change it.Read
- FrameworksThe Constraint Nobody Is Looking AtApparent rep-performance problems are often system constraints. How to tell the difference before you coach, PIP or replace.Read
- GTM LaunchpadMost reps surrender too early in conversationsWhy teams can generate replies but still fail to create real sales conversations.Read
More in the Resource Library and on Media.
Give your SDR managers a system they can actually inspect and coach.
If you want this kind of operating-partnership work in your own org, see how the Revenue Rebuild works today. Read the evidence first, then we can talk about your system.
Based on historical engagement documentation and Donna McCurley's published client testimonial, quoted verbatim. Diagrams are conceptual summaries created for this report, not client materials. No performance metric is published because none was measured or audited.